07/14/2025 / By Laura Harris
The United Nations (UN) has unveiled its first-ever Global Risk Report, placing “mis- and disinformation” among the gravest global threats.
Published this July, the report warns that narratives not aligned with official messaging could jeopardize the flagship initiative of the UN: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Alongside the report, the UN announced the creation of a new task force specifically designed to address how such narratives might “disrupt” its operations. Rather than fostering open dialogue or emphasizing press freedoms, the focus of this effort is squarely on managing and insulating their agenda from external influence.
The task force’s core objective is to assess the impact of mis- and disinformation on the delivery of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It offers little detail on how this initiative will protect public interests or reinforce democratic values. Instead, it emphasizes safeguarding institutional operations from disruption.
The SDGs cover nearly every facet of global policy, from climate change and economic development to education and healthcare. This makes the UN’s push to control the narrative surrounding them particularly significant.
Moreover, survey data included in the report, collected from member states, NGOs, private sector players and civil society groups, showed overwhelming support for government-led and multi-stakeholder approaches to addressing these “information threats.” (Related: UN launching cyber ARMY to aggressively push Agenda 2030 while suppressing everything they label “disinformation.”)
However, the report stops short of endorsing more open communication, fact-checking collaboration or initiatives that would bolster public media literacy.
“This newly established task force has a single focus. Its job is to assess how so-called mis- and disinformation affect the UN’s ability to deliver on its goals,” Cindy Harper wrote in her article for Reclaim the Net. “The report does not describe how this benefits the public or strengthens democratic values. Instead, the team’s mission is about insulating UN operations from disruption, particularly as they pertain to the Sustainable Development Goals.”
In other words, the UN defines threats not in terms of public confusion or harm, but in how they interfere with its own objectives.
This launch is not the UN’s first move to shape the global flow of information.
Back in 2023, it released the Voluntary Code of Conduct for Information Integrity on Digital Platforms. This initiative was built on the UN’s existing policy brief on information integrity and was intended to guide platforms and governments in filtering harmful content online, especially during crises.
UN Secretary-General António Guterres presented the code as a tool to promote factual accuracy. But then, the document laid out a far-reaching framework for controlling online content and enforcing approved narratives. It called on a broad coalition, including governments, tech companies, media outlets and advertisers, to coordinate efforts to suppress certain types of speech.
Key recommendations include tighter algorithmic controls, restricting ad revenue for flagged content and implementing expansive fact-checking initiatives. Notably, the code emphasizes training and capacity-building, not to encourage open inquiry or debate, but to instill a uniform definition of what qualifies as unacceptable speech.
Disinfo.news has more similar stories.
Watch the video below to know why the DHS Disinformation Government Board is a new threat to the whole system.
This video is from the Liberty and Finance channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
Tagged Under:
Agenda 2030, bias, Censorship, Collapse, Crybullies, cyber army, disinformation, Globalism, intolerance, left cult, lies, media fact watch, propaganda, speech police, thought police, truth, UN, United Nations
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 FIRSTAMENDMENT.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. FirstAmendment.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. FirstAmendment.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.