10/09/2024 / By Ethan Huff
During a recent appearance on CNN, two-time failed presidential wannabe Hillary Clinton gushed at length about how badly she wants Big Tech to censor Americans even more than they are being censored right now.
Unless the establishment wants to lose “total control” of everything, social media companies need to do a whole lot more to silence users who depart from the official narratives, Clinton told the fake news giant’s Michael Smerconish.
Clinton took aim specifically at X, formerly Twitter, which changed pretty substantially after electric vehicle (EV) guru Elon Musk bought the platform and took it private in 2022. Since that time, X has become a lot more right-wing whereas previously it leaned more to the left.
This dramatic shift in content moderation has not gone unnoticed by Clinton and others like her who feel as though the messages gaining the most traction on social media these days constitute “misinformation.”
“We should be, in my view, repealing something called Section 230, which gave platforms on the internet immunity because they were thought to be just pass-throughs, that they shouldn’t be judged for the content that is posted,” Clinton rattled to Smerconish, referring to the Communications Decency Act.
“If they don’t moderate and monitor the content, we lose total control.”
(Related: Hillary Clinton is back on the media circuit calling for Americans who speak against NATO and the U.S.-led military-industrial complex to be arrested and charged with crimes.)
Many on X are discussing the strange impacts of Hurricane Helene that suggest weather modification may have been at play. Clinton and others find this speculation to be dangerous, along with social media claims that FEMA is mishandling the crisis and even confiscating people’s donations to those in need.
Americans and people in general need someone to tell them what to say and what to think, Clinton says. Without this outside brain, i.e., the government and its tentacles, controlling everything that people see, the establishment could lose its stranglehold on society, which worries Clinton.
Clinton would like to see a much stronger censorship apparatus in place to handle not just X but also Facebook, Instagram and TikTok, all of which are allowing people to post and share content that Clinton finds upsetting.
Globalist climate lunatic John Kerry agrees with Clinton. At a recent World Economic Forum (WEF) “sustainability” conference, Kerry complained that the First Amendment is standing in the way of the establishment’s agenda.
“The dislike of and anguish over social media is just growing and growing,” Kerry complained. “It is part of our problem, particularly in democracies, in terms of building consensus around any issue.”
“It’s really hard to govern today. You can’t – the referees we used to have to determine what is a fact and what isn’t a fact have kind of been eviscerated, to a certain degree. And people go and self-select where they go for their news, for their information. And then you get into a vicious cycle.”
First of all, nobody asked political fossil John Kerry to govern them, despite his obvious delusions of grandeur. Secondly, “self-selecting” which news sources to trust is called using one’s brain in the way God intended.
Between Hillary Clinton’s frantic calls for Americans to think of the children! by allowing more censorship and John Kerry’s frustration about not having as much control over the masses these days, it is obvious that the powers that be (TPTB) are scared to death of losing control over everything, which appears to be happening with each passing day.
Hillary Clinton is an establishment tool who lacks the self-awareness to realize that nobody takes anything she says seriously anymore. Learn more at Censorship.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
banned, Big Tech, Censorship, Clinton, First Amendment, free press, free speech, freedom, Glitch, hillary, Hillary Clinton, Liberty, Social media, speech police, tech giants, thought crime, thought police
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 FIRSTAMENDMENT.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. FirstAmendment.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. FirstAmendment.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.