03/02/2022 / By Ethan Huff
A new bill proposed in the Golden State would classify any defiance by medical professionals of the “contemporary scientific consensus” on the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) as “unprofessional conduct.”
Co-written by five California Assembly and Senate members, the proposed bill was introduced to the Assembly Committee on Business and Professions by Democratic Assemblyman Evan Low. It could be reviewed as soon as March 17 during an Assembly Committee hearing.
According to an independent review of the legislation’s provisions, it would subject doctors who defy the prevailing narrative surrounding the Fauci Flu to a formal review by the Medical Board of California and the Osteopathic Medical Board of California.
“Existing law requires the applicable board to take action against any licensed physician and surgeon who is charged with unprofessional conduct, as provided,” the bill reads. (Related: Democratic Assemblymen in California also introduced another bill to force all employees in the state to be vaccinated.)
“This bill would designate the dissemination or promotion of misinformation or disinformation related to the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, or ‘COVID-19,’ as unprofessional conduct.”
The stated purpose of the bill is to punish doctors, surgeons and other medical professionals in the state who “disseminate or promote misinformation or disinformation related to COVID-19, including false or misleading information regarding the nature and risks of the virus, its prevention and treatment; and the development, safety, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines.”
In other states, the government is already punishing detractors and resisters of the official narrative with suspension of their medical licenses, for instance. Doctors who prescribe ivermectin, for example, are having their careers placed in jeopardy by corrupt state medical boards.
“The bill is meant to quell any dissent from the left’s rhetoric on COVID and to prevent medical professionals from treating their patients as they see fit,” reported 100percentfedup.com‘s Amber Crawford.
“This bill also contradicts the central idea of the scientific process which is to share and debate ideas to reach the most accurate conclusions.”
Should the bill pass, Los Angeles psychiatrist Mark McDonald is planning to sue the state of California.
“I think when you stand up and you don’t give an inch, in most cases, the bullies are actually cowards and they will collapse,” McDonald is quoted as saying.
If only more medical professionals and Americans in general were like McDonald, this whole plandemic could have been stopped before it even began. Unfortunately, many people just fell right in line out of convenience, or because they fell for the propaganda.
“Sounds like censorship of the most educated people in the population,” wrote someone about how California Democrats are trying to stamp out free-thinking doctors and medical professionals from the ranks.
“Isn’t this a free speech issue that falls under the First Amendment?” asked another.
The free speech issue, by the way, is probably the angle McDonald will take in the event that he is forced to file a lawsuit against California for infringing on his constitutional rights.
“So basically they are replacing the historical authorities from the days of Inquisitions,” suggested someone else. “Where if you believed the earth was round or orbited the sun you could be burned at the stake.”
“They seek to destroy anyone who thinks differently from them. Like we have witnessed numerous times in history. Yes, it does repeat itself. The executioners just wear suits and ties now and instead of burning, you were tied to a pole as they make you a non-person and destroy you.”
More related news about the government crackdown on Wuhan Flu “wrongspeak” can be found at Fascism.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
big government, California, Collapse, conspiracy, criminalize, democrats, doctors, fascism, First Amendment, freedom, insanity, intolerance, medical censorship, obey, pandemic, Tyranny
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 FIRSTAMENDMENT.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. FirstAmendment.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. FirstAmendment.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.